Adaptive Randomization to Improve Utility-Based Dose-Finding with Bivariate Ordinal Outcomes

A sequentially outcome-adaptive Bayesian design is proposed for choosing the dose of an experimental therapy based on elicited utilities of a bivariate ordinal (toxicity, efficacy) outcome. Subject to posterior acceptability criteria to control the risk of severe toxicity and exclude unpromising dos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 785 - 801
Main Authors Thall, Peter F., Nguyen, Hoang Q.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis Group 01.07.2012
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A sequentially outcome-adaptive Bayesian design is proposed for choosing the dose of an experimental therapy based on elicited utilities of a bivariate ordinal (toxicity, efficacy) outcome. Subject to posterior acceptability criteria to control the risk of severe toxicity and exclude unpromising doses, patients are randomized adaptively among the doses having posterior mean utilities near the maximum. The utility increment used to define near-optimality is nonincreasing with sample size. The adaptive randomization uses each dose's posterior probability of a set of good outcomes, defined by a lower utility cutoff. Saturated parametric models are assumed for the marginal dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy distributions, allowing the possible requirement of monotonicity in dose, and a copula is used to obtain a joint distribution. Prior means are computed by simulation using elicited outcome probabilities, and prior variances are calibrated to control prior effective sample size and obtain a design with good operating characteristics. The method is illustrated by a Phase I/II trial of radiation therapy for children with brainstem gliomas.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1054-3406
1520-5711
DOI:10.1080/10543406.2012.676586