Structural basis of toxicity and immunity in contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems

Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems encode polymorphic toxin/immunity proteins that mediate competition between neighboring bacterial cells. We present crystal structures of CDI toxin/immunity complexes from Escherichia coli EC869 and Burkholderia pseudomallei 1026b. Despite sharing li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 109; no. 52; pp. 21480 - 21485
Main Authors Morse, Robert P., Nikolakakis, Kiel C., Willett, Julia L. E., Gerrick, Elias, Low, David A., Hayes, Christopher S., Goulding, Celia W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 26.12.2012
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems encode polymorphic toxin/immunity proteins that mediate competition between neighboring bacterial cells. We present crystal structures of CDI toxin/immunity complexes from Escherichia coli EC869 and Burkholderia pseudomallei 1026b. Despite sharing little sequence identity, the toxin domains are structurally similar and have homology to endonucleases. The EC869 toxin is a Zn ²⁺-dependent DNase capable of completely degrading the genomes of target cells, whereas the Bp1026b toxin cleaves the aminoacyl acceptor stems of tRNA molecules. Each immunity protein binds and inactivates its cognate toxin in a unique manner. The EC869 toxin/immunity complex is stabilized through an unusual β-augmentation interaction. In contrast, the Bp1026b immunity protein exploits shape and charge complementarity to occlude the toxin active site. These structures represent the initial glimpse into the CDI toxin/immunity network, illustrating how sequence-diverse toxins adopt convergent folds yet retain distinct binding interactions with cognate immunity proteins. Moreover, we present visual demonstration of CDI toxin delivery into a target cell.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216238110
Author contributions: D.A.L., C.S.H., and C.W.G. designed research; R.P.M., K.C.N., J.L.E.W., and E.G. performed research; R.P.M., K.C.N., J.L.E.W., D.A.L., C.S.H., and C.W.G. analyzed data; and R.P.M., K.C.N., C.S.H., and C.W.G. wrote the paper.
1R.P.M. and K.C.N. contributed equally to this work.
Edited by Susan K. Buchanan, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and accepted by the Editorial Board November 9, 2012 (received for review September 18, 2012)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1216238110