Predictability of tooth rotations in patients treated with clear aligners

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 11348
• Main Authors: D’Antò, Vincenzo, Rongo, Roberto, Casaburo, Sossio Dario, Martina, Stefano, Petrucci, Paolo, Keraj, Kreshnik, Valletta, Rosa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 18.05.2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 692/700/3032/3128/3046; 692/700/3032/3145; Accuracy; Adult; Clear aligners; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Male; Malocclusion - therapy; Mandible; Maxilla; Models, Dental; multidisciplinary; Patients; Predictability; Rotation; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Teeth; Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation; Tooth Movement Techniques - methods; Young Adult; Accuracy; Clear aligners; Predictability; Rotation
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61594-2

Clear aligners are employed daily for the treatment of several malocclusions. Previous clinical studies indicated low accuracy for the correction of tooth rotations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictability of tooth rotations with clear aligners. The sample comprised 390 teeth (190 mandibular; 200 maxillary), measured from the virtual models of 45 participants (21 men, 24 women; mean age: 29.2 ± 6.6 years old). For each patient, pre-treatment (T0) digital dental models (STL files), virtual plan (T1) and post-treatment digital dental models (T2) of both the mandibular and maxillary arches were imported onto Geomagic Control X, a 3D metrology software which allows angular measurements. Rotations were calculated by defining reproducible vectors for all teeth in each STL file and superimposing both T0 with T1 to determine the prescribed rotation, and T0 with T2 to determine the achieved rotation. Prescribed and achieved rotations were compared to assess movement’s accuracy. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test were used to assess differences between the prescribed and achieved movements ( P  < 0.05). The overall predictability of rotational movement was 78.6% for the mandibular arch and 75.0% for the maxillary arch. Second molar accuracy was the lowest in both arches. Clear aligners were not able to achieve 100% of the planned movements.