Modified method of recording and reproducing natural head position with a multicamera system and a laser level

• Published in: American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics Vol. 147; no. 6; pp. 781 - 787
• Main Authors: Liu, Xiao-jing, Li, Qian-qian, Pang, Yuan-jie, Tian, Kai-yue, Xie, Zheng, Li, Zi-li
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2015
• Subjects: Computer Simulation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data; Dentistry; Feasibility Studies; Fiducial Markers; Head - anatomy & histology; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data; Lasers; Phantoms, Imaging; Photogrammetry - statistics & numerical data; Photography - instrumentation; Photography - statistics & numerical data; Posture; Reproducibility of Results; User-Computer Interface
• ISSN: 0889-5406; 1097-6752
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.016

Introduction As computer-assisted surgical design becomes increasingly popular in maxillofacial surgery, recording patients' natural head position (NHP) and reproducing it in the virtual environment are vital for preoperative design and postoperative evaluation. Our objective was to test the repeatability and accuracy of recording NHP using a multicamera system and a laser level. Methods A laser level was used to project a horizontal reference line on a physical model, and a 3-dimensional image was obtained using a multicamera system. In surgical simulation software, the recorded NHP was reproduced in the virtual head position by registering the coordinate axes with the horizontal reference on both the frontal and lateral views. The repeatability and accuracy of the method were assessed using a gyroscopic procedure as the gold standard. Results The interclass correlation coefficients for pitch and roll were 0.982 (0.966, 0.991) and 0.995 (0.992, 0.998), respectively, indicating a high degree of repeatability. Regarding accuracy, the lack of agreement in orientation between the new method and the gold standard was within the ranges for pitch (−0.69°, 1.71°) and for roll (−0.92°, 1.20°); these have no clinical significance. Conclusions This method of recording and reproducing NHP with a multicamera system and a laser level is repeatable, accurate, and clinically feasible.