Late Planting of Short-Season Cotton in Saline Fields of the Yellow River Delta

Normal planting of full-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (NPF) in saline fields of the Yellow River valley, China, is currently faced with poor stand establishment, late maturity, and increasing cost of inputs. Our objective was to determine if late planting of short-season cotton (LPS) may all...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop science Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 292 - 300
Main Authors Dong, Hezhong, Li, Weijiang, Xin, Chengsong, Tang, Wei, Zhang, Dongmei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison Crop Science Society of America 01.01.2010
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Normal planting of full-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (NPF) in saline fields of the Yellow River valley, China, is currently faced with poor stand establishment, late maturity, and increasing cost of inputs. Our objective was to determine if late planting of short-season cotton (LPS) may alleviate these problems. In the first experiment, the effects of cultivar, planting date, seeding rate, and their interactions on stand establishment and seedling Na+ and malondialdehyde concentrations were studied. We also compared varietal effects, input costs, and gross economic returns under NPF and LPS. Late planting improved stand establishment due to increased temperature and reduced Na+ and malondialdehyde concentrations in cotton tissues. The LPS at 21 kg seeds ha1 (LPSM) and NPF at 30 kg seeds ha-1 (NPFH) yielded better than other treatment combinations. Varietal effects on lint yield were not significant. The output value of both systems was comparable; however, the net revenue from LPSM was 32% greater than that from NPFH due to lower material cost and labor inputs. Late planting of short-season cotton is a promising option for cotton production in saline areas of the Yellow River delta and probably in other cotton-growing areas with similar ecologies.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0167
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
ISSN:0011-183X
1435-0653
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0167