The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences: Optimal cut‐off scores for detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder
Objectives The need for a brief screening tool for psychosis is widely recognized. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self‐report measure of psychosis, but a cut‐off score that can detect those most likely to fulfill diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorder is not...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of methods in psychiatric research Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. e1893 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.12.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives
The need for a brief screening tool for psychosis is widely recognized. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self‐report measure of psychosis, but a cut‐off score that can detect those most likely to fulfill diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorder is not established.
Methods
A case–control sample from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis Project study (N = 1375, healthy individuals, n = 507, and individuals with a psychotic disorder, n = 868), was used to examine cut‐off scores of the CAPE with receiver operating curve analyses. We examined 27 possible cut‐off scores computed from a combination of scores from the frequency and distress scales of the various factors of the CAPE.
Results
The weighted severity positive symptom dimension was most optimal in detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder (>1.75 cut‐off; area under the curve = 0.88; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 88%), which correctly identified 80% of the sample as cases or controls with a diagnostic odds ratio of 22.69.
Conclusions
The CAPE can be used as a first screening tool to detect individuals who are likely to fulfill criteria for a psychotic disorder. The >1.75 cut‐off of the weighted severity positive symptom dimension provides a better prediction than all alternatives tested so far. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis [GROUP] Investigators comprise Therese van Amelsvoort, Agna A. Bartels‐Velthuis, Richard Bruggeman, Wiepke Cahn, Lieuwe de Haan, Rene S. Kahn, Jim van Os, Frederike Schirmbeck, Claudia J.P. Simons. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1049-8931 1557-0657 1557-0657 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mpr.1893 |