Virtual Residency Interview Experience: The Child Neurology Residency Program Perspective

• Published in: Pediatric neurology Vol. 126; pp. 3 - 8
• Main Authors: Ream, Margie A., Thompson-Stone, Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2022
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Communicable Disease Control; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - prevention & control; COVID-19 - transmission; Education, Medical, Graduate; Graduate medical education; Humans; Internship and Residency; Interviews as Topic; Match; Neurology - education; Original; Pediatrics - education; Residency application; School Admission Criteria; Survey; Surveys and Questionnaires; Videoconferencing; Virtual interviews; Virtual interviews; Residency application; Survey; Graduate medical education; Match
• ISSN: 0887-8994; 1873-5150
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.09.016

The COVID-19 pandemic presented many challenges for graduate medical education, including the need to quickly implement virtual residency interviews. We investigated how different programs approached these challenges to determine best practices. Surveys to solicit perspectives of program directors, program coordinators, and chief residents regarding virtual interviews were designed through an iterative process by two child neurology residency program directors. Surveys were distributed by email in May 2021. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Responses were received from 35 program directors and 34 program coordinators from 76 programs contacted. Compared with the 2019-2020 recruitment season, in 2020-2021, 14 of 35 programs received >10% more applications and most programs interviewed ≥12 applicants per position. Interview days were typically five to six hours long and were often coordinated with pediatrics interviews. Most programs (13/15) utilized virtual social events with residents, but these often did not allow residents to provide quality feedback about applicants. Program directors could adequately assess most applicant qualities but felt that virtual interviews limited their ability to assess applicants' interpersonal communication skills and to showcase special features of their programs. Most respondents felt that a combination of virtual and in-person interviewing should be utilized in the future. Residency program directors perceived some negative impacts of virtual interviewing on their recruitment efforts but in general felt that virtual interviews adequately replaced in-person interviews for assessing applicants. Most programs felt that virtual interviewing should be utilized in the future.