Modification, calibration and verification of the IWA River Water Quality Model to simulate a pilot-scale high rate algal pond

• Published in: Water research (Oxford) Vol. 46; no. 9; pp. 2911 - 2926
• Main Authors: Broekhuizen, Niall, Park, Jason B.K., McBride, Graham B., Craggs, Rupert J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2012; Elsevier
• Subjects: Algae; Algal mixotrophy; Algal production; Applied sciences; Biomass; Calibration; Computer simulation; Dissolution; Exact sciences and technology; Freshwater; Microalgae - metabolism; Models, Theoretical; Nutrient removal; Parametrization; Pilot Projects; Pollution; Ponds; Rivers; Waste-water treatment ponds; Water quality; Water treatment and pollution; Nutrient removal; Waste-water treatment ponds; Algal production; Algal mixotrophy; Stabilization pond; Algae; Carbon dioxide; Biomass; Calibration; Nitrogen; Parameterization; Modeling; Biological purification; Dissolved organic carbon; Dissolved organic matter; Greenhouse gas; Surface water; Water quality; Nutrient; Stream; Waste water purification; Performance
• ISSN: 0043-1354; 1879-2448
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.011

We implemented the IWA River Water Quality Model No. 1 (Reichert et al., 2001. River Water Quality Model No. 1, IWA Scientific & Technical Report No. 12) to simulate water-quality characteristics in two pilot-scale High Rate Algal Ponds. Simulation results were compared with two years' of data from the ponds. The first year's data from one pond were used for model calibration; the remaining data were used for validation. As originally formulated and parameterized, the model consistently yielded summer-time algal biomass concentrations which were too low – with consequent failures in its reproduction of dissolved oxygen, pH and nutrient dynamics. We experimented with various structural/parametric changes to improve the model's performance. The most effective strategy was to greatly increase the respiratory losses suffered by the heterotrophic osmotrophs (thereby giving the algae access to a larger fraction of the incoming dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen). This suggests that CO2-bubbling alone cannot entirely preclude resource-limitation of algal production. We doubt that our parameterization of heterotrophic osmotrophs is correct and infer that the algae derive a large fraction of their nutrition by direct osmotrophic uptake of dissolved organic matter. This inference is supported by the literature concerning the physiology of the dominant algal species in our ponds. [Display omitted] ► We applied the IWA River Water Quality Number 1 to two High Rate Algal Ponds. ► In its original form, the model was unable to reproduce the field data. ► With some structural and parametric changes it reproduced most aspects of the data. ► We infer that algal mixotrophy nutrition is an important process in our ponds. ► A literature search confirmed that the dominant alga (Pediastrum) is mixotrophic.