Evaluation of the bioMérieux VIDAS HIV Duo Quick and Anti-HCV assays for dried blood spot based serosurveillance

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 10171
• Main Authors: Cholette, François, Farmer, Braedy, Balakireva, Olga, Pavlova, Daria, Lopatenko, Anna, Chukhalova, Iryna, Bargan, Svitlana, Mishra, Sharmistha, Becker, Marissa, Lee, Emma R., Kim, John, Sandstrom, Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 17.06.2022; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/1647; 631/1647/664; 692/53; 692/53/2421; Blood; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dried Blood Spot Testing; Hepatitis C Antibodies; HIV; HIV Infections - diagnosis; HIV Infections - epidemiology; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; multidisciplinary; Performance evaluation; Reagents; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sensitivity and Specificity; Specimen Handling - methods
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14041-z

Serosurveillance is central to monitoring our progress towards HIV and HCV elimination targets proposed for 2030. However, serosurveillance systems are ineffective without reliable serological assays for the detection of HIV and HCV antibodies. Assays should also be compatible with dried blood spot (DBS) samples to facilitate biological sample collection. The VIDAS HIV Duo Quick and Anti-HCV assays are sold as reagents strips and processed by the automated VIDAS benchtop immunoanalyser. While both assays have shown excellent performance in serum and plasma, performance data in DBS samples is lacking. In our study, we evaluate the performance of the VIDAS HIV Duo Quick and Anti-HCV assays in DBS ( n  = 725) collected during a cross-sectional serosurvey (the Transitions study). The VIDAS HIV Duo quick had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.5% (95% CI 85.1%, 98.5%) and 95.7% (95% CI 93.9%, 97.0%) respectively. Likewise, the VIDAS Anti-HCV had a sensitivity and specificity of 95.6% (95% CI 91.6%, 97.8%) and 95.6% (95% CI 93.5%, 97.0%) respectively. These assays are unlikely to be helpful in low-prevalence settings due to sub-optimal performance, but their performance could likely be improved by optimizing DBS elution protocols which was, unfortunately, not possible during our study.