First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs

In this paper, we distinguish between firm-level learning effects that result from ‘first-order’ and ‘second-order’ additionalities in innovation policy interventions. ‘First-order’ additionalities represent direct firm-level R&D subsidies, whereas ‘second-order’ additionalities result from know...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch policy Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 59 - 76
Main Authors Autio, Erkko, Kanninen, Sami, Gustafsson, Robin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.02.2008
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesResearch Policy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, we distinguish between firm-level learning effects that result from ‘first-order’ and ‘second-order’ additionalities in innovation policy interventions. ‘First-order’ additionalities represent direct firm-level R&D subsidies, whereas ‘second-order’ additionalities result from knowledge spill-overs, horizontal knowledge exchanges between firms, and from other meso- or community-level effects. Analyzing data from collaborative R&D programs in Finland, we show that enhancing identification with a community of practice among R&D program participants (proxy for second-order additionality) enhances firm-level learning outcomes beyond those resulting from direct R&D subsidy (proxy for first-order additionality). Learning effects facilitated by second-order additionality are not confined to technological learning alone, encompassing also business and market learning. We also show that aspects of program implementation enhance identification with a community of practice, which then mediate the relationship between program implementation and firm-level learning outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-7333
1873-7625
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.012