Usefulness of the ACGME Resident Survey: A View from Internal Medicine Program Directors

On Jul 1, 2013, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) began implementation of the Next Accreditation System (NAS). Annual data reporting for residency programs in the NAS includes 9 reporting components. In addition to 3 new components (Milestones reporting, Clinical Learn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of medicine Vol. 127; no. 4; pp. 351 - 355
Main Authors Adams, Michael, MD, Willett, Lisa L., MD, Wahi-Gururaj, Sandhya, MD, MPH, Halvorsen, Andrew J., MS, Angus, Steven V., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2014
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Accreditation
Data Collection
Education, Medical, Graduate
Executives
Health education
Initiatives
Internal Medicine
Medical residencies
Perceptions
Physician Executives
Societies, Medical
United States
United States
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:On Jul 1, 2013, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) began implementation of the Next Accreditation System (NAS). Annual data reporting for residency programs in the NAS includes 9 reporting components. In addition to 3 new components (Milestones reporting, Clinical Learning Environment Review, and the annual faculty survey), the ACGME recently made substantial changes to the annual resident survey. Here, Adams et al evaluate Internal Medicine program directors' perceptions of the new ACGME survey and identify specific areas of perceived or real inconsistency or areas allowing for misinterpretation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9343
1555-7162
DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.010