The significance of region-specific habitat models as revealed by habitat shifts of grey-faced buzzard in response to different agricultural schedules

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 22889
• Main Authors: Kito, Kensuke, Fujita, Go, Iseki, Fumitaka, Miyashita, Tadashi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 24.11.2021; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/158/2445; 631/158/2456; 631/158/672; 631/158/851; Agricultural land; Agricultural practices; Amphibians; Climatic conditions; Grasslands; Habitat selection; Habitats; Humanities and Social Sciences; multidisciplinary; Prey; Regions; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Variation
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02315-x

To determine large scales habitat suitability for focal species, habitat models derived from one region are often extrapolated to others. However, extrapolation can be inappropriate due to regional variation of habitat selection. Accounting for the ecological mechanisms causing such variation is necessary to resolve this problem. We focused on grey-faced buzzards in agricultural landscapes of Japan, which show geographically different habitat selection. To determine whether this variation is caused by the difference in climatic conditions at geographical scales or the difference in agricultural practices at smaller regional scales, we surveyed distributions of buzzards and their major prey (frogs/orthopterans) in regions differing in rice-transplanting schedules within the same climatic zone. We found that buzzards preferred paddy-forest landscapes in the early transplanting regions, but grassland-forest landscapes in the late transplanting regions. Frogs were more abundant in the early transplanting regions due to flooded paddies, while the abundance of orthopterans did not differ. The regional variation in habitat selection of buzzards may be due to different prey availabilities caused by different agricultural schedules. We propose that habitat suitability assessments of organisms inhabiting agricultural landscapes should consider differences in production systems at regional scales and such regional partitioning is effective for accurate assessments.