Effect of montelukast compared with inhaled fluticasone on airway inflammation

Summary Background Inhaled corticosteroids are currently regarded as the gold standard in anti‐inflammatory therapy, however, leukotriene receptor antagonists have been ascribed anti‐inflammatory properties. Objective We directly compared the anti‐inflammatory effects of inhaled fluticasone propiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental allergy Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 1388 - 1394
Main Authors Overbeek, S. E., O'Sullivan, S., Leman, K., Mulder, P. G. H., Hoogsteden, H. C., Prins, J.-B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.09.2004
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background Inhaled corticosteroids are currently regarded as the gold standard in anti‐inflammatory therapy, however, leukotriene receptor antagonists have been ascribed anti‐inflammatory properties. Objective We directly compared the anti‐inflammatory effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP, 100 μg Diskus, twice daily) and oral montelukast (MON 10 mg, nocte) in bronchial biopsies of patients with asthma in a double‐blind, double‐dummy, parallel‐group design. Methods Bronchial biopsies, serum and urine samples were collected from 36 atopic asthmatics before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Activated T cells (CD25+), eosinophils (MBP+) and mast cells (tryptase+) were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and IL‐5 were analysed by radio and enzyme immunoassay (EIA), respectively. Urinary 9α‐11β‐PGF2 and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) were measured by EIA. Results A comparison of changes from baseline [FP/MON ratio (95% confidence interval)] of activated T cells was not different when subjects were treated with FP compared to treatment with MON [1.00 (0.18–4.86); P=0.924]. Following treatment, mast cells in the FP group were significantly lower than in the group treated with MON [0.39 (0.16–0.97); P=0.041]. There was no difference in the number of eosinophils in the lamina propria following either treatment [0.54 (0.05–2.57); P=0.263]. However, treatment with FP resulted in a significantly greater decrease in serum ECP, compared to treatment with MON [0.37 (0.25–0.71); P=0.002]. Conclusions FP appears to be superior to MON as an anti‐inflammatory therapy in mild asthmatics.
Bibliography:istex:050C0BD423FCC921BFE6EDB0CFCD545361666C64
ArticleID:CEA2041
ark:/67375/WNG-50QTKP9F-P
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-News-3
ISSN:0954-7894
1365-2222
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02041.x