Mechanisms within the Parietal Cortex Correlate with the Benefits of Random Practice in Motor Adaptation
The motor learning literature shows an increased retest or transfer performance after practicing under unstable (random) conditions. This random practice effect (also known as contextual interference effect) is frequently investigated on the behavioral level and discussed in the context of mechanism...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 11; p. 403 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Research Foundation
02.08.2017
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1662-5161 1662-5161 |
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00403 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The motor learning literature shows an increased retest or transfer performance after practicing under unstable (random) conditions. This random practice effect (also known as contextual interference effect) is frequently investigated on the behavioral level and discussed in the context of mechanisms of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and increased cognitive efforts during movement planning. However, there is a lack of studies examining the random practice effect in motor adaptation tasks and, in general, the underlying neural processes of the random practice effect are not fully understood. We tested 24 right-handed human subjects performing a reaching task using a robotic manipulandum. Subjects learned to adapt either to a blocked or a random schedule of different force field perturbations while subjects' electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. The behavioral results showed a distinct random practice effect in terms of a more stabilized retest performance of the random compared to the blocked practicing group. Further analyses showed that this effect correlates with changes in the alpha band power in electrodes over parietal areas. We conclude that the random practice effect in this study is facilitated by mechanisms within the parietal cortex during movement execution which might reflect online feedback mechanisms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Reviewed by: David L. Wright, Texas A&M University, United States; Marika Berchicci, Foro Italico University of Rome, Italy; Bahamn Nasseroleslami, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland Edited by: Christopher J. Hasson, Northeastern University, United States |
ISSN: | 1662-5161 1662-5161 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00403 |