A Study of the Effects of Electrode Number and Decoding Algorithm on Online EEG-Based BCI Behavioral Performance

• Published in: Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 12; p. 227
• Main Authors: Meng, Jianjun, Edelman, Bradley J., Olsoe, Jaron, Jacobs, Gabriel, Zhang, Shuying, Beyko, Angeliki, He, Bin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 06.04.2018; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Algorithms; BCI; Biomedical engineering; Brain; channel configuration; Computer applications; CSP; EEG; electrode number; Electrodes; Electroencephalography; Emulation; Implants; Internet; Learning; Mental task performance; Motor task performance; Neuroscience; Robotics; Signal processing; Stroke; Studies; Minneapolis Minnesota; United States > US; CSP; BCI; channel configuration; EEG; electrode number
• ISSN: 1662-453X; 1662-4548; 1662-453X
• DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00227

Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI) using electroencephalography (EEG) has demonstrated promising applications by directly decoding users' movement related mental intention. The selection of control signals, e.g., the channel configuration and decoding algorithm, plays a vital role in the online performance and progressing of BCI control. While several offline analyses report the effect of these factors on BCI accuracy for a single session-performance increases asymptotically by increasing the number of channels, saturates, and then decreases-no online study, to the best of our knowledge, has yet been performed to compare for a single session or across training. The purpose of the current study is to assess, in a group of forty-five subjects, the effect of channel number and decoding method on the progression of BCI performance across multiple training sessions and the corresponding neurophysiological changes. The 45 subjects were divided into three groups using Laplacian Filtering (LAP/S) with nine channels, Common Spatial Pattern (CSP/L) with 40 channels and CSP (CSP/S) with nine channels for online decoding. At the first training session, subjects using CSP/L displayed no significant difference compared to CSP/S but a higher average BCI performance over those using LAP/S. Despite the average performance when using the LAP/S method was initially lower, but LAP/S displayed improvement over first three sessions, whereas the other two groups did not. Additionally, analysis of the recorded EEG during BCI control indicates that the LAP/S produces control signals that are more strongly correlated with the target location and a higher R-square value was shown at the fifth session. In the present study, we found that subjects' average online BCI performance using a large EEG montage does not show significantly better performance after the first session than a smaller montage comprised of a common subset of these electrodes. The LAP/S method with a small EEG montage allowed the subjects to improve their skills across sessions, but no improvement was shown for the CSP method.