Cooperation and Competition with Hyperscanning Methods: Review and Future Application to Emotion Domain

Cooperation and competition, as two common and opposite examples of interpersonal dynamics, are thought to be reflected by different cognitive, neural, and behavioral patterns. According to the conventional approach, they have been explored by measuring subjects' reactions during individual per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in computational neuroscience Vol. 11; p. 86
Main Authors Balconi, Michela, Vanutelli, Maria E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 29.09.2017
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cooperation and competition, as two common and opposite examples of interpersonal dynamics, are thought to be reflected by different cognitive, neural, and behavioral patterns. According to the conventional approach, they have been explored by measuring subjects' reactions during individual performance or turn-based interactions in artificial settings, that don't allow on-line, ecological enactment of real-life social exchange. Considering the importance of these factors, and accounting for the complexity of such phenomena, the hyperscanning approach emerged as a multi-subject paradigm since it allows the simultaneous recording of the brain activity from multiple participants interacting. In this view, the present paper aimed at reviewing the most significant work about cooperation and competition by EEG hyperscanning technique, which proved to be a promising tool in capturing the sudden course of social interactions. In detail, the review will consider and group different experimental tasks that have been developed so far: (1) paradigms that used rhythm, music and motor synchronization; (2) card tasks taken from the Game Theory; (3) computerized tasks; and (4) possible real-life applications. Finally, although highlighting the potential contribution of such approach, some important limitations about these paradigms will be elucidated, with a specific focus on the emotional domain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Giuseppe Placidi, University of L'Aquila, Italy
Reviewed by: Erika Molteni, University College London, United Kingdom; Roberto Santana, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Spain
ISSN:1662-5188
1662-5188
DOI:10.3389/fncom.2017.00086