The Inside-Out Transobturator Male Sling for the Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy: Midterm Results of a Single-Center Prospective Study

Abstract Background Transobturator slings are currently promoted for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), but data on outcome remain limited. Objective To assess, at midterm, the efficacy and safety of the inside-out transobturator male sling for treat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean urology Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 608 - 615
Main Authors Leruth, Julie, Waltregny, David, de Leval, Jean
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.03.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Transobturator slings are currently promoted for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), but data on outcome remain limited. Objective To assess, at midterm, the efficacy and safety of the inside-out transobturator male sling for treating post-RP SUI and to determine factors associated with failure. Design, setting, and participants Prospective one-center trial involving 173 consecutive patients without detrusor overactivity, treated between 2006 and 2011 for SUI following RP. Intervention Placement of an inside-out transobturator sling. Measurements Baseline and follow-up evaluations included uroflowmetry and continence and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. Cure was defined as no pad use and improvement as a number of pads per day reduced by ≥50% and two or fewer pads. Complications were recorded, and factors associated with treatment failure were evaluated. Results and limitations Preoperatively, 21%, 35%, and 44% of the patients were using two, three to five, and more than five pads per day, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24 mo (range: 12–60 mo), 49% were cured, 35% improved, and 16% not improved. QoL was enhanced ( p < 0.001), and 72% of patients were moderately to completely satisfied with the procedure. Maximum flow rates were slightly reduced ( p = 0.004); postvoid residual volumes were similar ( p = 0.097). Complications were urinary retention after catheter removal (15%), perineal/scrotal hematoma (9%), pain lasting >6 mo (3%), and sling infection (2%); all were managed conservatively. Severe SUI before sling surgery was not associated with a worse outcome, whereas obesity and a history of pelvic irradiation or bladder neck stenosis were independent risk factors of failure, with risk ratios of 7.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3–18.9), 3.3 (95% CI, 1.4–7.8), and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.1–6.5), respectively. Conclusions The inside-out transobturator male sling is an efficient and safe treatment for post-RP SUI at midterm. Patients with prior pelvic irradiation may not be suitable candidates.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
scopus-id:2-s2.0-84856400363
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.036