Mobile Data Collection: Smart, but Not (Yet) Smart Enough

(2013) showed that processing speed is important for understanding between-person differences in working memory, whereas attention switching is of greater importance to within-person variations. [...]it can be argued that the proper study of the dynamic nature of psychological processes requires rep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 12; p. 971
Main Authors Seifert, Alexander, Hofer, Matthias, Allemand, Mathias
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 18.12.2018
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:(2013) showed that processing speed is important for understanding between-person differences in working memory, whereas attention switching is of greater importance to within-person variations. [...]it can be argued that the proper study of the dynamic nature of psychological processes requires repeated observations within individuals (Conner et al., 2009). [...]as measurement devices, smartphones are both powerful and widespread in the population. Because most participants already have their own smartphones, an app is the only thing they need to install to participate in a study (Miller, 2012). [...]an interdisciplinary research approach involving researchers interested in collecting data with smartphones and experts familiar with those forms of data collection, management, and analysis is crucial.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Neural Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Edited by: Myra Spiliopoulou, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Germany
Reviewed by: Henning Peters, Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Germany; Johannes Schobel, University of Ulm, Germany
ISSN:1662-4548
1662-453X
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.00971