Mobile Data Collection: Smart, but Not (Yet) Smart Enough
(2013) showed that processing speed is important for understanding between-person differences in working memory, whereas attention switching is of greater importance to within-person variations. [...]it can be argued that the proper study of the dynamic nature of psychological processes requires rep...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 12; p. 971 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Research Foundation
18.12.2018
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | (2013) showed that processing speed is important for understanding between-person differences in working memory, whereas attention switching is of greater importance to within-person variations. [...]it can be argued that the proper study of the dynamic nature of psychological processes requires repeated observations within individuals (Conner et al., 2009). [...]as measurement devices, smartphones are both powerful and widespread in the population. Because most participants already have their own smartphones, an app is the only thing they need to install to participate in a study (Miller, 2012). [...]an interdisciplinary research approach involving researchers interested in collecting data with smartphones and experts familiar with those forms of data collection, management, and analysis is crucial. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Neural Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience Edited by: Myra Spiliopoulou, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Germany Reviewed by: Henning Peters, Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Germany; Johannes Schobel, University of Ulm, Germany |
ISSN: | 1662-4548 1662-453X 1662-453X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00971 |