Patterns of recurrence in the basal and non-basal subtypes of triple-negative breast cancers

Traditional prognostic markers for breast cancer include estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (ER) and HER2/neu. Negative staining for these three markers defines the ‘triple-negative' phenotype. By adding markers for cytokeratin 5/6 and EGFR, triple-negative breast cancers can be divi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBreast cancer research and treatment Vol. 118; no. 1; pp. 131 - 137
Main Authors Nofech-Mozes, Sharon, Trudeau, Maureen, Kahn, Harriet K, Dent, Rebecca, Rawlinson, Ellen, Sun, Ping, Narod, Steven A, Hanna, Wedad M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Boston : Springer US 01.11.2009
Springer US
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Traditional prognostic markers for breast cancer include estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (ER) and HER2/neu. Negative staining for these three markers defines the ‘triple-negative' phenotype. By adding markers for cytokeratin 5/6 and EGFR, triple-negative breast cancers can be divided into ‘basal-like' and ‘normal-like' subgroups. We conducted immuno-staining on a panel of 958 patients with breast cancer, using all five markers and we followed the patients for distal recurrence and death. We compared rates of distal recurrence in the basal-like and normal-like subgroups with that of women with ER-positive breast cancer. Only 16 of 958 women had normal-like breast cancers. These cancers resembled basal-like cancers in that they had a high proliferative index, but the women with normal-like breast cancers resembled ER-positive women in terms of distant recurrence. The addition of CK5/6 and EGFR to the standard panel (ER/PR/HER2/neu) defines a small subgroup of women with normal-like breast cancer. The prognosis of these women may be superior to that of basal-like breast cancers but firm conclusions cannot be made.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0295-8
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-008-0295-8