Travel Planning Ability in Right Brain-Damaged Patients: Two Case Reports

• Published in: Frontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 14; p. 117
• Main Authors: Bocchi, Alessia, Palmiero, Massimiliano, Boccia, Maddalena, Di Vita, Antonella, Guariglia, Cecilia, Piccardi, Laura
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 31.03.2020; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Apraxia; Brain; Brain injury; Case reports; Human Neuroscience; Medical imaging; Memory; Navigation behavior; navigational impairments; navigational planning; Neglect syndromes; Planning; right brain lesions; spatial navigation; Studies; Travel; travel planning; navigational planning; planning; spatial navigation; navigational impairments; right brain lesions; travel planning; topographical orientation
• ISSN: 1662-5161; 1662-5161
• DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00117

Planning ability is fundamental for goal-directed spatial navigation. Preliminary findings from patients and healthy individuals suggest that travel planning (TP)-namely, navigational planning-can be considered a distinct process from visuospatial planning (VP) ability. To shed light on this distinction, two right brain-damaged patients without hemineglect were compared with a control group on two tasks aimed at testing VP (i.e., Tower of London-16, ToL-16) and TP (i.e., Minefield Task, MFT). The former requires planning the moves to reach the right configuration of three colored beads on three pegs, whereas the latter was opportunely developed to assess TP in the navigational environment when obstacles are present. Specifically, the MFT requires participants to plan a route on a large carpet avoiding some hidden obstacles previously observed. Patient 1 showed lesions encompassing the temporoparietal region and the insula; she performed poorer than the control group on the ToL-16 but showed no deficit on the MFT. Conversely, Patient 2 showed lesions mainly located in the occipitoparietal network of spatial navigation; she performed worse than the control group on the MFT but not on the ToL-16. In both cases performances satisfied the criteria for a classical dissociation, meeting criteria for a double dissociation. These results support the idea that TP is a distinct ability and that it is dissociated from VP skills.