Powerful Statistical Inference for Nested Data Using Sufficient Summary Statistics

Hierarchically-organized data arise naturally in many psychology and neuroscience studies. As the standard assumption of independent and identically distributed samples does not hold for such data, two important problems are to accurately estimate group-level effect sizes, and to obtain powerful sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 12; p. 103
Main Authors Dowding, Irene, Haufe, Stefan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 19.03.2018
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hierarchically-organized data arise naturally in many psychology and neuroscience studies. As the standard assumption of independent and identically distributed samples does not hold for such data, two important problems are to accurately estimate group-level effect sizes, and to obtain powerful statistical tests against group-level null hypotheses. A common approach is to summarize subject-level data by a single quantity per subject, which is often the mean or the difference between class means, and treat these as samples in a group-level -test. This "naive" approach is, however, suboptimal in terms of statistical power, as it ignores information about the intra-subject variance. To address this issue, we review several approaches to deal with nested data, with a focus on methods that are easy to implement. With what we call the sufficient-summary-statistic approach, we highlight a computationally efficient technique that can improve statistical power by taking into account within-subject variances, and we provide step-by-step instructions on how to apply this approach to a number of frequently-used measures of effect size. The properties of the reviewed approaches and the potential benefits over a group-level -test are quantitatively assessed on simulated data and demonstrated on EEG data from a simulated-driving experiment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Edited by: Vladimir Litvak, UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Reviewed by: Alexandre Gramfort, Inria Saclay - Île-de-France Research Centre, France; Cyril R. Pernet, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
ISSN:1662-5161
1662-5161
DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00103