Quantifying Motor Task Performance by Bounded Rational Decision Theory
Expected utility models are often used as a normative baseline for human performance in motor tasks. However, this baseline ignores computational costs that are incurred when searching for the optimal strategy. In contrast, bounded rational decision-theory provides a normative baseline that takes co...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 12; p. 932 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Research Foundation
14.12.2018
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Expected utility models are often used as a normative baseline for human performance in motor tasks. However, this baseline ignores computational costs that are incurred when searching for the optimal strategy. In contrast, bounded rational decision-theory provides a normative baseline that takes computational effort into account, as it describes optimal behavior of an agent with limited information-processing capacity to change a prior motor strategy (before information-processing) into a posterior strategy (after information-processing). Here, we devised a pointing task where subjects had restricted reaction and movement time. In particular, we manipulated the permissible reaction time as a proxy for the amount of computation allowed for planning the movements. Moreover, we tested three different distributions over the target locations to induce different prior strategies that would influence the amount of required information-processing. We found that movement endpoint precision generally decreases with limited planning time and that non-uniform prior probabilities allow for more precise movements toward high-probability targets. Considering these constraints in a bounded rational decision model, we found that subjects were generally close to bounded optimal. We conclude that bounded rational decision theory may be a promising normative framework to analyze human sensorimotor performance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Edited by: Walter Adriani, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Italy This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience Reviewed by: Vieri Giuliano Santucci, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione (ISTC), Italy; BenoÎt Girard, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France |
ISSN: | 1662-453X 1662-4548 1662-453X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00932 |