Efficacy of dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to body mass index

Aims In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there is an ‘obesity paradox’, where survival is better in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) and weight loss is associated with worse outcomes. We examined the effect of a sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor according to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of heart failure Vol. 23; no. 10; pp. 1662 - 1672
Main Authors Adamson, Carly, Jhund, Pardeep S., Docherty, Kieran F., Bělohlávek, Jan, Chiang, Chern‐En, Diez, Mirta, Drożdż, Jarosław, Dukát, Andrej, Howlett, Jonathan, Ljungman, Charlotta E.A., Petrie, Mark C., Schou, Morten, Inzucchi, Silvio E., Køber, Lars, Kosiborod, Mikhail N., Martinez, Felipe A., Ponikowski, Piotr, Sabatine, Marc S., Solomon, Scott D., Bengtsson, Olof, Langkilde, Anna Maria, Lindholm, Daniel, Sjöstrand, Mikaela, McMurray, John J.V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there is an ‘obesity paradox’, where survival is better in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) and weight loss is associated with worse outcomes. We examined the effect of a sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor according to baseline BMI in the Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse‐outcomes in Heart Failure trial (DAPA‐HF). Methods and results Body mass index was examined using standard categories, i.e. underweight (<18.5 kg/m2); normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2); overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2); obesity class I (30.0–34.9 kg/m2); obesity class II (35.0–39.9 kg/m2); and obesity class III (≥40 kg/m2). The primary outcome in DAPA‐HF was the composite of worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Overall, 1348 patients (28.4%) were under/normal‐weight, 1722 (36.3%) overweight, 1013 (21.4%) obesity class I and 659 (13.9%) obesity class II/III. The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for the primary outcome with obesity class 1, the lowest risk group, as reference was: under/normal‐weight 1.41 (1.16–1.71), overweight 1.18 (0.97–1.42), obesity class II/III 1.37 (1.10–1.72). Patients with class I obesity were also at lowest risk of death. The effect of dapagliflozin on the primary outcome and other outcomes did not vary by baseline BMI, e.g. hazard ratio for primary outcome: under/normal‐weight 0.74 (0.58–0.94), overweight 0.81 (0.65–1.02), obesity class I 0.68 (0.50–0.92), obesity class II/III 0.71 (0.51–1.00) (P‐value for interaction = 0.79). The mean decrease in weight at 8 months with dapagliflozin was 0.9 (0.7–1.1) kg (P < 0.001). Conclusion We confirmed an ‘obesity survival paradox’ in HFrEF. We showed that dapagliflozin was beneficial across the wide range of BMI studied. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03036124. Key findings from the analyses of body mass index in the DAPA‐HF trial. BMI, body mass index; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1388-9842
1879-0844
1879-0844
DOI:10.1002/ejhf.2308