Spatial/temporal correlation of BOLD and optical intrinsic signals in humans

Comparing the BOLD signal with electrophysiological maps and other perfusion‐dependent signals, such as the optical intrinsic signal (OIS), within subjects should provide insight into the etiology of the BOLD signal. Tongue activations were compared in five human subjects using BOLD fMRI, 610‐nm OIS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMagnetic resonance in medicine Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 766 - 776
Main Authors Pouratian, Nader, Sicotte, Nancy, Rex, David, Martin, Neil A., Becker, Donald, Cannestra, Andrew F., Toga, Arthur W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2002
Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comparing the BOLD signal with electrophysiological maps and other perfusion‐dependent signals, such as the optical intrinsic signal (OIS), within subjects should provide insight into the etiology of the BOLD signal. Tongue activations were compared in five human subjects using BOLD fMRI, 610‐nm OIS, and the electrocortical stimulation map (ESM). Robust fMRI activations centered on the lateral inferior aspect of the central sulcus and extended into pre‐ and post‐central gyri, adjacent to ESM tongue loci. OIS and fMRI maps colocalized, although optical responses were spatially larger (P < .001 across multiple thresholds) and contained more gyral components. The timecourses of the fMRI and OIS signals were similar, appearing within 2.5 s and peaking 6–8 s after task onset. Although many processes contribute to increased 610‐nm reflectance, optical spectroscopy and fluorescent dye imaging suggest that a significant part of this signal is due to a concomitant decrease in deoxyhemoglobin and increase in oxyhemoglobin concentrations. The spatial/temporal correlation of BOLD and the positive 610‐nm response within subjects suggests that the two signals may share similar etiologies. The OIS/fMRI inconsistencies may be due to cell swelling and light‐scattering contributions to OIS and fMRI sensitivity. This study also demonstrates that fMRI maps do not precisely colocalize with ESM, rather they emphasize changes in adjacent venous/sulcal structures. Magn Reson Med 47:766–776, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:MRM10096
Leonard and Dorothy Strauss Scholars in Neuroscience Program
Brain Mapping Support Foundation
NIH Medical Scientist Training Program - No. GM08042
istex:34D081AFF97AE211DEF1751BA0CAC0C49FD34FE8
Northstar Fund
Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization
Robson Family
Training Program in Neuroimaging - No. MH19950
National Center for Research Resources - No. RR12169; No. M01 RR00865
NINDS - No. K08/NS02044
Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation
Jennifer Jones-Simon Foundation
NIMH - No. MH/NS52083
Tamkin Foundation
NIH National Research Service Award - No. MH12773
Ahmanson Foundation
Pierson-Lovelace Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-Q16XHLM4-D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.10096