Spatial/temporal correlation of BOLD and optical intrinsic signals in humans
Comparing the BOLD signal with electrophysiological maps and other perfusion‐dependent signals, such as the optical intrinsic signal (OIS), within subjects should provide insight into the etiology of the BOLD signal. Tongue activations were compared in five human subjects using BOLD fMRI, 610‐nm OIS...
Saved in:
Published in | Magnetic resonance in medicine Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 766 - 776 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.04.2002
Williams & Wilkins |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Comparing the BOLD signal with electrophysiological maps and other perfusion‐dependent signals, such as the optical intrinsic signal (OIS), within subjects should provide insight into the etiology of the BOLD signal. Tongue activations were compared in five human subjects using BOLD fMRI, 610‐nm OIS, and the electrocortical stimulation map (ESM). Robust fMRI activations centered on the lateral inferior aspect of the central sulcus and extended into pre‐ and post‐central gyri, adjacent to ESM tongue loci. OIS and fMRI maps colocalized, although optical responses were spatially larger (P < .001 across multiple thresholds) and contained more gyral components. The timecourses of the fMRI and OIS signals were similar, appearing within 2.5 s and peaking 6–8 s after task onset. Although many processes contribute to increased 610‐nm reflectance, optical spectroscopy and fluorescent dye imaging suggest that a significant part of this signal is due to a concomitant decrease in deoxyhemoglobin and increase in oxyhemoglobin concentrations. The spatial/temporal correlation of BOLD and the positive 610‐nm response within subjects suggests that the two signals may share similar etiologies. The OIS/fMRI inconsistencies may be due to cell swelling and light‐scattering contributions to OIS and fMRI sensitivity. This study also demonstrates that fMRI maps do not precisely colocalize with ESM, rather they emphasize changes in adjacent venous/sulcal structures. Magn Reson Med 47:766–776, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:MRM10096 Leonard and Dorothy Strauss Scholars in Neuroscience Program Brain Mapping Support Foundation NIH Medical Scientist Training Program - No. GM08042 istex:34D081AFF97AE211DEF1751BA0CAC0C49FD34FE8 Northstar Fund Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization Robson Family Training Program in Neuroimaging - No. MH19950 National Center for Research Resources - No. RR12169; No. M01 RR00865 NINDS - No. K08/NS02044 Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation Jennifer Jones-Simon Foundation NIMH - No. MH/NS52083 Tamkin Foundation NIH National Research Service Award - No. MH12773 Ahmanson Foundation Pierson-Lovelace Foundation ark:/67375/WNG-Q16XHLM4-D ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrm.10096 |