Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion

Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurology Vol. 83; no. 16; p. 1464
Main Authors Burkle, Christopher M, Sharp, Richard R, Wijdicks, Eelco F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 14.10.2014
Subjects
Adolescent
Brain Death - diagnosis
Brain Death - legislation & jurisprudence
Brain Death - physiopathology
California
Death
Ethics, Medical
Guidelines as Topic
Health Education
Humans
Male
United States
United States
California
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defining test-the apnea test. This core principle in neurology has been challenged recently in court and resulted in an unprecedented continuation of care in a 13-year-old child declared dead. This review comments on the medical, legal, and ethical quandaries introduced by this case and highlights the major elements of consensus on matters related to brain death that have been forged over 3 decades of sustained medical and societal debate. A clear appreciation by physicians and the public of the diagnostic determination of death following loss of brain function will help to prevent similar conflicts from occurring in the future.
ISSN:1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000883