Alternative ear-canal measures related to absorbance

• Published in: Ear and hearing Vol. 34 Suppl 1; p. 72S
• Main Authors: Neely, Stephen T, Stenfelt, Stefan, Schairer, Kim S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2013
• Subjects: Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods; Acoustic Stimulation; Audiology - instrumentation; Ear Canal; Humans; Terminology as Topic
• ISSN: 1538-4667
• DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829c7229

Several alternative ear-canal measures are similar to absorbance in their requirement for prior determination of a Thévenin-equivalent sound source. Examples are (1) sound intensity level, (2) forward pressure level, (3) time-domain ear-canal reflectance, and (4) cochlear reflectance. These four related measures are similar to absorbance in their utilization of wideband stimuli and their focus on recording ear-canal sound pressure. The related measures differ from absorbance in how the ear-canal pressure is analyzed and in the type of information that is extracted from the recorded response. Sound intensity level and forward pressure level have both been shown to be better as measures of sound level in the ear canal compared with sound pressure level because they reduced calibration errors due to standing waves in studies of behavioral thresholds and otoacoustic emissions. Time-domain ear-canal reflectance may be used to estimate ear-canal geometry and may have the potential to assess middle ear pathology. Cochlear reflectance reveals information about the inner ear that is similar to what is provided by other types of otoacoustic emissions, and may have theoretical advantages that strengthen its interpretation.