Mortality among chrome leather tannery workers: An update

Background Employees engaged in the tanning and finishing of leather are potentially exposed to numerous carcinogens. Methods A previous mortality study among 9,352 workers from two chrome tanneries has been updated with the addition of 11 years of vital status and work history follow‐up and 1,153 n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of industrial medicine Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 197 - 206
Main Author Stern, Frank B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.08.2003
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Employees engaged in the tanning and finishing of leather are potentially exposed to numerous carcinogens. Methods A previous mortality study among 9,352 workers from two chrome tanneries has been updated with the addition of 11 years of vital status and work history follow‐up and 1,153 new deaths. Ninety‐two different causes of death were analyzed using a modified life‐table approach. Death rates from both the United States and the states in which the tanneries were located were used as the comparison populations in calculating cause‐specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Results The mortality risks from all causes and from all cancers were lower than the expected for the combined cohort. Analyzing the two tanneries separately, no a priori cause of death (i.e., cancer of the lung, pancreas, bladder, kidney, testes, nasal cavity, lymphoma, or soft‐tissue sarcoma) was shown to be significantly elevated. An exception was lung cancer at one tannery when state death rates were used (SMR = 130, P < 0.01). Analyzing by duration of employment, no significant trend in any cause of death at either tannery was revealed. Conclusions Some studies have shown elevated risks for various site‐specific causes of cancer; however, sites in excess are not consistent between studies. The differences may have been due to distinct processes used by the tanneries resulting in varying levels, as well as different types, of exposures. Am. J. Ind. Med. 44:197–206, 2003. Published 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-7ZJ5LKHG-V
ArticleID:AJIM10242
This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
istex:9C5E3794029E26F79E530F9D1D73988985444506
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/ajim.10242