Aortic Valve Replacement for Paraprosthetic Leak After Transcatheter Implantation
Conversion to surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been described as a complication following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. This complication occurs in up to 8% of cases and, to the best of our knowledge, preoperative data and surgical outcomes of such patients have not been proper...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cardiac surgery Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 47 - 51 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.01.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Conversion to surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been described as a complication following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. This complication occurs in up to 8% of cases and, to the best of our knowledge, preoperative data and surgical outcomes of such patients have not been properly evaluated. Mild paraprosthetic regurgitation is commonly observed after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and usually leads to a benign clinical course. Unequal distribution of valve calcifications is described as a potential mechanism. We report a case of a perioperative paraprosthetic regurgitation that underwent successful urgent surgical AVR and review the incidence and results of paraprosthetic leaks following transcatheter implantation.
(J Card Surg 2012;27:47–51) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-PVLZVNFM-X istex:0ABEECD9301116F3D0E53AC67A4E84DBC073B8A2 ArticleID:JOCS1351 The authors have no conflicts of interest or sources of support to declare regarding the devices used in this report. Conflict of interest ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Case Study-3 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Feature-5 ObjectType-Report-2 ObjectType-Article-4 |
ISSN: | 0886-0440 1540-8191 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01351.x |