Evolving progress in oncologic and operative outcomes for esophageal and junctional cancer: Lessons from the experience of a high-volume center

Objective Modern series from high-volume esophageal centers report an approximate 40% 5-year survival in patients treated with curative intent and postoperative mortality rates of less than 4%. An objective analysis of factors that underpin current benchmarks within high-volume centers has not been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 143; no. 5; pp. 1130 - 1137.e1
Main Authors Reynolds, John V., MD, Donohoe, Claire L., MB, McGillycuddy, Erin, MSc, Ravi, Naraymasamy, MD, O’Toole, Dermot, MD, O’Byrne, Ken, MD, Hollywood, Donal, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.05.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Modern series from high-volume esophageal centers report an approximate 40% 5-year survival in patients treated with curative intent and postoperative mortality rates of less than 4%. An objective analysis of factors that underpin current benchmarks within high-volume centers has not been performed. Methods Three time periods were studied, 1990 to 1998 (period 1), 1999 to 2003 (period 2), and 2004 to 2008 (period 3), in which 471, 254, and 342 patients, respectively, with esophageal cancer were treated with curative intent. All data were prospectively recorded, and staging, pathology, treatment, operative, and oncologic outcomes were compared. Results Five-year disease-specific survival was 28%, 35%, and 44%, and in-hospital postoperative mortality was 6.7%, 4.4%, and 1.7% for periods 1 to 3, respectively ( P  < .001). Period 3, compared with periods 1 and 2, respectively, was associated with significantly ( P  < .001) more early tumors (17% vs 4% and 6%), higher nodal yields (median 22 vs 11 and 18), and a higher R0 rate in surgically treated patients (81% vs 73% and 75%). The use of multimodal therapy increased ( P  < .05) across time periods. By multivariate analysis, age, T stage, N stage, vascular invasion, R status, and time period were significantly ( P  < .0001) associated with outcome. Conclusions Improved survival with localized esophageal cancer in the modern era may reflect an increase of early tumors and optimized staging. Important surgical and pathologic standards, including a higher R0 resection rate and nodal yields, and lower postoperative mortality, were also observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.003