Group analyses of connectivity-based cortical parcellation using repeated k-means clustering

• Published in: NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 1666 - 1677
• Main Authors: Nanetti, Luca, Cerliani, Leonardo, Gazzola, Valeria, Renken, Remco, Keysers, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2009; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Algorithms; Anatomical connectivity; Artificial Intelligence; Brain - anatomy & histology; Cluster Analysis; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Humans; Image Enhancement - methods; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Insula; K-means; K-means clustering; Male; Nerve Net - anatomy & histology; Neural Pathways - anatomy & histology; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; SMA–preSMA; Statistics; Young Adult; K-means; Insula; SMA–preSMA; K-means clustering; Anatomical connectivity
• ISSN: 1053-8119; 1095-9572; 1095-9572
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.014

K-means clustering has become a popular tool for connectivity-based cortical segmentation using Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) data. A sometimes ignored issue is, however, that the output of the algorithm depends on the initial placement of starting points, and that different sets of starting points therefore could lead to different solutions. In this study we explore this issue. We apply k-means clustering a thousand times to the same DWI dataset collected in 10 individuals to segment two brain regions: the SMA–preSMA on the medial wall, and the insula. At the level of single subjects, we found that in both brain regions, repeatedly applying k-means indeed often leads to a variety of rather different cortical based parcellations. By assessing the similarity and frequency of these different solutions, we show that ∼256 k-means repetitions are needed to accurately estimate the distribution of possible solutions. Using nonparametric group statistics, we then propose a method to employ the variability of clustering solutions to assess the reliability with which certain voxels can be attributed to a particular cluster. In addition, we show that the proportion of voxels that can be attributed significantly to either cluster in the SMA and preSMA is relatively higher than in the insula and discuss how this difference may relate to differences in the anatomy of these regions.