Fate simulation and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals in a reservoir receiving recycled wastewater

A fugacity based model was applied to simulate the distribution of three endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), namely estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) in a reservoir receiving recycled wastewater in Australia. At typical conditions, the majority of estrogens were remo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 408; no. 24; pp. 6243 - 6250
Main Authors Cao, Qiming, Yu, Qiming, Connell, Des W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 15.11.2010
[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A fugacity based model was applied to simulate the distribution of three endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), namely estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) in a reservoir receiving recycled wastewater in Australia. At typical conditions, the majority of estrogens were removed by degradation in the water compartment. A sensitivity analysis found that the simulated concentrations of E1, E2 and EE2 were equally sensitive to the parameters of temperature (T), reservoir water volume (V) and equivalent biomass concentration (EBC), but E1 was more sensitive to estrogen concentration in the recycled water (C e) and recycling rate (F r). In contrast, all three estrogens were not sensitive to reservoir water releasing rate (F d). Furthermore, a probabilistic health risk assessment showed that the simulated concentrations were below fish exposure threshold value (ETV) and human public health standard (PHS). Human equivalent dose of EDCs from fish consumption was about 10 times higher than that from drinking water consumption. The highest risk quotient among the three estrogens was found for EE2 with less than 9.5 × 10 −2, implying negligible health risks.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.059
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.059