Predicting Patient-Specific Tumor Dynamics: How Many Measurements Are Necessary?

• Published in: Cancers Vol. 15; no. 5; p. 1368
• Main Authors: Harshe, Isha, Enderling, Heiko, Brady-Nicholls, Renee
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 21.02.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Decision making; Development and progression; Diagnosis; Females; Growth models; Growth rate; Lung cancer; Mammography; Mathematical models; Optimization; Ordinary differential equations; Patients; Radiation; Tumors; Women; United States; patient-specific; prediction; logistic growth
• ISSN: 2072-6694; 2072-6694
• DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051368

Acquiring sufficient data is imperative to accurately predict tumor growth dynamics and effectively treat patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the number of volume measurements necessary to predict breast tumor growth dynamics using the logistic growth model. The model was calibrated to tumor volume data from 18 untreated breast cancer patients using a varying number of measurements interpolated at clinically relevant timepoints with different levels of noise (0-20%). Error-to-model parameters and the data were compared to determine the sufficient number of measurements needed to accurately determine growth dynamics. We found that without noise, three tumor volume measurements are necessary and sufficient to estimate patient-specific model parameters. More measurements were required as the level of noise increased. Estimating the tumor growth dynamics was shown to depend on the tumor growth rate, clinical noise level, and acceptable error of the to-be-determined parameters. Understanding the relationship between these factors provides a metric by which clinicians can determine when sufficient data have been collected to confidently predict patient-specific tumor growth dynamics and recommend appropriate treatment options.