The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent

Statement of problem Surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts may not always increase adhesion, especially on the post/resin-based luting agent interface, which is a weaker interface than the dentin/adhesive interface. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 103; no. 6; pp. 362 - 368
Main Authors Choi, Yunjung, DDS, MS, Pae, Ahran, DDS, MSD, PhD, Park, Eun-Jin, DDS, PhD, Wright, Robert F., DDS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.06.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Statement of problem Surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts may not always increase adhesion, especially on the post/resin-based luting agent interface, which is a weaker interface than the dentin/adhesive interface. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different post surface treatments on the bond strength of a luting agent to a fiber post. Material and methods Sixty-eight fiber-reinforced posts (D. T. Light-Post) were divided into 4 groups and treated with 1 of the following surface treatment procedures: no treatment (NS) (control), silanization (SA) (Monobond-S), airborne-particle abrasion (AB) (Airsonic Alu-Oxyd), or silanization subsequent to airborne-particle abrasion (AB plus SA). Specimens were bonded with dual-polymerizing resin-based luting material (Variolink II) and stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours. Shear bond strength (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and the multiple comparisons Scheffé test with Bonferroni correction (α=.05). Results Shear bond strength of the luting agent to the post was significantly affected by surface treatment ( P <.05). Treating the surface of the post with airborne-particle abrasion resulted in a significantly higher bond strength compared with other treatments. There was no significant difference in bond strength between the silanization group and the no treatment group or the silanization plus airborne-particle abrasion group. Conclusions Airborne-particle abrasion provided a significant increase in bond strength between the post and the luting agent evaluated, without additional treatments. (J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:362–368)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60078-9