Coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with preoperative non–dialysis dependent renal insufficiency: A randomized study

Objective Preoperative renal insufficiency is a predictor of acute renal failure in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be less deleterious than on-pump bypass in patients with normal renal func...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 133; no. 2; pp. 378 - 388.e3
Main Authors Sajja, Lokeswara Rao, MCh, FACS, Mannam, Gopichand, FRCS (Ed), FRCS (CT), Chakravarthi, Rajasekara M., MD, DNB, Sompalli, Sriramulu, MD, Naidu, Shanti K., MD, Somaraju, Bhupathiraju, MD, DM, Penumatsa, Raghava Raju, MD, DM
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.02.2007
AATS/WTSA
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Preoperative renal insufficiency is a predictor of acute renal failure in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be less deleterious than on-pump bypass in patients with normal renal function, but the effect of this technique in patients with non–dialysis dependent renal insufficiency in a randomized study is unknown. Methods From August 2004 through October 2005, 116 consecutive patients with preoperative non–dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate measured using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation [MDRD GFR] ≤ 60 mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2 ) undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to on-pump (n = 60) and off-pump (n = 56) groups. MDRD GFR and serum creatinine levels were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at days 1 and 5. The changes in renal function and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Preoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed on the data that showed worsening of renal function in the on-pump group compared with the off-pump group (serum creatinine, P < .000; glomerular filtration rate, P < .000). Further analysis of subgroups of patients with diabetes alone, hypertension alone, and combined hypertension and diabetes also showed significant deterioration renal function in the on-pump group compared with the off-pump group. In covariate analysis, diabetes has emerged as a significant covariate by serum creatinine criteria while compromised left ventricular function has emerged as a significant covariate by glomerular filtration rate criteria. These analyses showed that the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is significantly associated with adverse renal outcome ( P < .000). Three patents required hemodialysis in the on-pump group and none in the off-pump group. The mean number of grafts per patient was 3.85 ± 0.86 and 3.11 ± 0.89 in the on-pump and off-pump groups, respectively ( P < .001), but the indices of completeness of revascularization, 1.00 ± 0.08 for off-pump coronary bypass and 1.01 ± 0.08 for on-pump coronary bypass, were similar ( P = .60). Conclusions This study suggests that on-pump as compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is more deleterious to renal function in diabetic patients with non–dialysis dependent renal insufficiency. MDRD GFR is a more sensitive investigation than serum creatinine levels to assess renal insufficiency in patients undergoing coronary bypass.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.028