A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Interprofessional Education Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education

Objective. To identify and describe the available quantitative tools that assess interprofessional education (IPE) relevant to pharmacy education. Methods. A systematic approach was used to identify quantitative IPE assessment tools relevant to pharmacy education. The search strategy included the Na...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education Vol. 81; no. 6; p. 119
Main Authors Shrader, Sarah, Farland, Michelle Z., Danielson, Jennifer, Sicat, Brigitte, Umland, Elena M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2017
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective. To identify and describe the available quantitative tools that assess interprofessional education (IPE) relevant to pharmacy education. Methods. A systematic approach was used to identify quantitative IPE assessment tools relevant to pharmacy education. The search strategy included the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education Resource Exchange (Nexus) website, a systematic search of the literature, and a manual search of journals deemed likely to include relevant tools. Results. The search identified a total of 44 tools from the Nexus website, 158 abstracts from the systematic literature search, and 570 abstracts from the manual search. A total of 36 assessment tools met the criteria to be included in the summary, and their application to IPE relevant to pharmacy education was discussed. Conclusion. Each of the tools has advantages and disadvantages. No single comprehensive tool exists to fulfill assessment needs. However, numerous tools are available that can be mapped to IPE-related accreditation standards for pharmacy education.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0002-9459
1553-6467
DOI:10.5688/ajpe816119