Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?

The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine compl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Vol. 109; no. 6; pp. 599 - 605
Main Authors Osório, Ana Paula Susin, Quadros, Alexandre Schaan de, Vieira, José Luiz da Costa, Portal, Vera Lucia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 01.12.2017
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0066-782X
1678-4170
1678-4170
DOI:10.5935/abc.20170174