Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine compl...
Saved in:
Published in | Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Vol. 109; no. 6; pp. 599 - 605 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
01.12.2017
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0066-782X 1678-4170 1678-4170 |
DOI: | 10.5935/abc.20170174 |