An efficient method for the application of PHA-poor solvents to extract polyhydroxybutyrate from Cupriavidus necator

There are many published studies presenting ethanol and acetone as PHAs‐poor solvents, where these two solvents are shown to dissolve <2% (w/v) of PHAs at low temperatures. In this study, the suitability of ethanol and acetone for the recovery of PHB at different temperatures (from room temperatu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiotechnology progress Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 1480 - 1486
Main Authors Aramvash, Asieh, Gholami-Banadkuki, Narges, Seyedkarimi, Mansooreh-Sadat
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There are many published studies presenting ethanol and acetone as PHAs‐poor solvents, where these two solvents are shown to dissolve <2% (w/v) of PHAs at low temperatures. In this study, the suitability of ethanol and acetone for the recovery of PHB at different temperatures (from room temperature to near boiling point) in Cupriavidus necator was investigated. Experiments were performed using response surface methodology to examine the effects of different temperatures and heating incubation times on recovery percentage using the two solvents. The highest recovery percentage (92.3%) and product purity (up to 99%) were obtained with ethanol‐assisted extraction at 76°C for 32 min of incubation time. Under these conditions the extracted PHB exhibited a molecular mass of 1.2 × 106. The present strategy showed that at temperatures near its boiling point, ethanol, as a nonhalogenated solvent, represents a good alternative to halogenated solvents, like chloroform, when PHB recovery is concerned. DSC analysis showed good thermal properties for ethanol‐ and acetone‐extracted biopolymers. GC and 1H NMR analysis confirmed the extracted biopolymer to be polyhydroxybutyrate of good purity. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:1480–1486, 2016
Bibliography:istex:EDBC7BC1851D49DB8681D37887815527E57354EF
ArticleID:BTPR2346
The Research Council of Malek-Ashtar University of Technology
ark:/67375/WNG-H21764N9-4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:8756-7938
1520-6033
DOI:10.1002/btpr.2346