The UK service level audit of insulin pump therapy in adults

Aims The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published guidelines for the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in 2008 (technology appraisal 151). The first UK‐wide insulin pump audit took place in 2012 with the aim of determining adherence to the guidance issued...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetic medicine Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 412 - 418
Main Authors White, H. D., Goenka, N., Furlong, N. J., Saunders, S., Morrison, G., Langridge, P., Paul, P., Ghatak, A., Weston, P. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2014
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published guidelines for the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in 2008 (technology appraisal 151). The first UK‐wide insulin pump audit took place in 2012 with the aim of determining adherence to the guidance issued in NICE technology appraisal 151. The results of the adult service level audit are reported here. Methods All centres providing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion services to adults with diabetes in the UK were invited to participate. Audit metrics were aligned to technology appraisal 151. Data entry took place online using a DiabetesE formatted data collection tool. Results One hundred and eighty‐three centres were identified as delivering adult continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion services in the UK, of which 178 (97.3%) participated in the audit. At the time of the audit, 13 428 adults were using insulin pump therapy, giving an estimated prevalence of use of 6%. Ninety‐three per cent of centres did not report any barriers in obtaining funding for patients who fulfilled NICE criteria. The mean number of consultant programmed activities dedicated to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion services was 0.96 (range 0–8), mean whole‐time equivalent diabetes specialist nurses was 0.62 (range 0–3) and mean whole‐time equivalent dietitian services was 0.3 (range 0–2), of which 39, 61 and 60%, respectively, were not formally funded. Conclusions The prevalence of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion use in the UK falls well below the expectation of NICE (15–20%) and that of other European countries (> 15%) and the USA (40%). This may be attributable, in part, to lack of healthcare professional time needed for identification and training of new pump therapy users. What's new? This is the first UK‐wide service level audit of insulin pump therapy. The audit metrics were aligned to National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal 151. Of all UK insulin pump centres, 97.3% participated in the audit. The audit results provide up‐to‐date information regarding the number of people using insulin pump therapy and the prevalence of use amongst people with Type 1 diabetes in the UK. The audit outcomes identify a significant shortfall in the funding of healthcare professionals required to deliver pump services and explores the barriers to provision of insulin pump therapy in the UK.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-87WRXW9L-6
Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD)
istex:BDC414A13D391CDB09DB3DAB51C6573628DC788D
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF)
Appendix S1. Adult service level audit metrics. Appendix S2. Participating centres-adult service level audit. Appendix S3. Members of the steering group.
Diabetes UK
ArticleID:DME12325
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/dme.12325