Influence of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Saxagliptin
Background and Objective Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus often have impaired renal function or may have impaired hepatic function, which can pose significant safety and tolerability issues for anti-hyperglycaemic pharmacotherapies. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of saxaglipt...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical pharmacokinetics Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 253 - 265 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.04.2011
Adis International Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Objective
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus often have impaired renal function or may have impaired hepatic function, which can pose significant safety and tolerability issues for anti-hyperglycaemic pharmacotherapies. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of saxagliptin and its pharmacologically active metabolite, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, in nondiabetic subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal or hepatic impairment, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were compared with saxagliptin and metabolite pharmacokinetics and tolerability in healthy adult subjects.
Methods
Two open-label, parallel-group, single-dose studies were conducted. Subjects received a single oral dose of saxagliptin 10 mg (Onglyza™).
Results
Compared with healthy subjects, the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC
∞
) for saxagliptin was 16%, 41% and 108% (2.1-fold) higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively. AUC
∞
values for 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were 67%, 192% (2.9-fold) and 347% (4.5-fold) higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively. As creatinine clearance (CL
CR
) values decreased, saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin AUC
∞
generally increased or became more variable. Twenty-three percent of the saxagliptin dose (measured as the sum of saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin) was cleared by haemodialysis in a 4-hour dialysis session.
In the hepatic impairment study, the differences in exposure to saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were less than 2-fold across all groups. As compared with healthy subjects matched for age, bodyweight, sex and smoking status, the AUC
∞
values for saxagliptin were 10%, 38% and 77% higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment, respectively. These values were 22%, 7% and 33% lower, respectively, for 5-hydroxy saxagliptin compared with matched healthy subjects.
Conclusions
One-half the usual dose of saxagliptin 5mg (i.e. 2.5 mg orally once daily) is recommended for patients with moderate (CL
CR
30–50 mL/min) or severe (CL
CR
<30 mL/min not on dialysis) renal impairment or ESRD, but no dose adjustment is recommended for those with mild renal impairment or any degree of hepatic impairment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0312-5963 1179-1926 1179-1926 |
DOI: | 10.2165/11584350-000000000-00000 |