Influence of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Saxagliptin

Background and Objective Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus often have impaired renal function or may have impaired hepatic function, which can pose significant safety and tolerability issues for anti-hyperglycaemic pharmacotherapies. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of saxaglipt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical pharmacokinetics Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 253 - 265
Main Authors Boulton, David, Li, Li, Frevert, Ernst U., Tang, Angela, Castaneda, Lorna, Vachharajani, Nimish N., Kornhauser, David M., Patel, Chirag G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.04.2011
Adis International
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objective Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus often have impaired renal function or may have impaired hepatic function, which can pose significant safety and tolerability issues for anti-hyperglycaemic pharmacotherapies. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of saxagliptin and its pharmacologically active metabolite, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, in nondiabetic subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal or hepatic impairment, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were compared with saxagliptin and metabolite pharmacokinetics and tolerability in healthy adult subjects. Methods Two open-label, parallel-group, single-dose studies were conducted. Subjects received a single oral dose of saxagliptin 10 mg (Onglyza™). Results Compared with healthy subjects, the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC ∞ ) for saxagliptin was 16%, 41% and 108% (2.1-fold) higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively. AUC ∞ values for 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were 67%, 192% (2.9-fold) and 347% (4.5-fold) higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively. As creatinine clearance (CL CR ) values decreased, saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin AUC ∞ generally increased or became more variable. Twenty-three percent of the saxagliptin dose (measured as the sum of saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin) was cleared by haemodialysis in a 4-hour dialysis session. In the hepatic impairment study, the differences in exposure to saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were less than 2-fold across all groups. As compared with healthy subjects matched for age, bodyweight, sex and smoking status, the AUC ∞ values for saxagliptin were 10%, 38% and 77% higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment, respectively. These values were 22%, 7% and 33% lower, respectively, for 5-hydroxy saxagliptin compared with matched healthy subjects. Conclusions One-half the usual dose of saxagliptin 5mg (i.e. 2.5 mg orally once daily) is recommended for patients with moderate (CL CR 30–50 mL/min) or severe (CL CR <30 mL/min not on dialysis) renal impairment or ESRD, but no dose adjustment is recommended for those with mild renal impairment or any degree of hepatic impairment.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0312-5963
1179-1926
1179-1926
DOI:10.2165/11584350-000000000-00000