Unintentional force changes in cyclical tasks performed by an abundant system: Empirical observations and a dynamical model

•Turning visual feedback off causes drifts in the midpoint and amplitude of force cycle.•Typically, midpoint drifts to lower values while amplitude increases.•In two-finger tasks, this is accompanied by desynchronization of finger force cycles.•A dynamical model with parameter drift is able to repro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience Vol. 350; pp. 94 - 109
Main Authors Reschechtko, Sasha, Hasanbarani, Fariba, Akulin, Vladimir M., Latash, Mark L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 14.05.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Turning visual feedback off causes drifts in the midpoint and amplitude of force cycle.•Typically, midpoint drifts to lower values while amplitude increases.•In two-finger tasks, this is accompanied by desynchronization of finger force cycles.•A dynamical model with parameter drift is able to reproduce these features.•The results fit the scheme of control with referent effector coordinates. The study explored unintentional force changes elicited by removing visual feedback during cyclical, two-finger isometric force production tasks. Subjects performed two types of tasks at 1Hz, paced by an auditory metronome. One – Force task – required cyclical changes in total force while maintaining the sharing, defined as relative contribution of a finger to total force. The other task – Share task – required cyclical changes in sharing while keeping total force unchanged. Each trial started under full visual feedback on both force and sharing; subsequently, feedback on the variable that was instructed to stay constant was frozen, and finally feedback on the other variable was also removed. In both tasks, turning off visual feedback on total force elicited a drop in the mid-point of the force cycle and an increase in the peak-to-peak force amplitude. Turning off visual feedback on sharing led to a drift of mean share toward 50:50 across both tasks. Without visual feedback there was consistent deviation of the two force time series from the in-phase pattern (typical of the Force task) and from the out-of-phase pattern (typical of the Share task). This finding is in contrast to most earlier studies that demonstrated only two stable patterns, in-phase and out-of-phase. We interpret the results as consequences of drifts of parameters in a dynamical system leading in particular to drifts in the referent finger coordinates toward their actual coordinates. The relative phase desynchronization is caused by the right–left differences in the hypothesized drift processes, consistent with the dynamic dominance hypothesis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-4522
1873-7544
1873-7544
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.022