Intra-flock variability in the body reserve dynamics of meat sheep by analyzing BW and body condition score variations over multiple production cycles

• Published in: Animal (Cambridge, England) Vol. 13; no. 9; pp. 1986 - 1998
• Main Authors: Macé, T., González-García, E., Carrière, F., Douls, S., Foulquié, D., Robert-Granié, C., Hazard, D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2019; Published by Elsevier (since 2021) / Cambridge University Press (until 2020); Elsevier
• Subjects: body reserves; cluster analysis; ewe; Life Sciences; longitudinal trajectories; Other; Physiology and Functional Biology; Research Article; Romane; ewe; body reserves; Romane; cluster analysis; longitudinal trajectories; body reserve; longitudinal trajectorie; romane
• ISSN: 1751-7311; 1751-732X
• DOI: 10.1017/S175173111800352X

Breeding for resilience requires a better understanding of intra-flock variability and the related mechanisms responsible for robustness traits. Among such traits, the animals’ ability to cope with feed fluctuations by mobilizing or restoring body reserves (BR) is a key mechanism in ruminants. The objective of this work was to characterize individual variability in BR dynamics in productive Romane ewes reared in extensive conditions. The BR dynamics profiles were characterized by combining individual longitudinal measurements of BW and body condition scores (BCS) over several production cycles. Historical data, including up to 2628 records per trait distributed in 1146 ewes, underwent cluster analysis. Two to four trajectories were observed for BW depending on the cycle, while three trajectories were found for BCS, whatever the cycle. Most trajectories suggested that BR dynamics were similar but the level of BR may differ between ewes. Nevertheless, some trajectories suggested that both BR dynamics and levels were different for a proportion of ewes. Clustering on BW and BCS profiles adjusted for individual level trends, resulted in differences only in the level of BW or BCS, rather than differences in trajectories. Thus, the overall shape of trajectories was not changed considering or not the individual level trend across cycles. In addition to individual variability, the ewe’s age at first lambing and litter size contributed to the distribution of the ewes between the trajectories. Regarding the entire productive life, three trajectories were observed for BW and BCS changes over three productive cycles. Increase in BW at each cycle suggested that ewes kept growing up until 3 to 4 years old in our conditions. Similar alternation of BCS gains and losses across cycles suggested BR dynamics might be repeatable. Many individual trajectories remained the same throughout a ewe’s life, whatever the age at first lambing, parity or litter size. Our results demonstrate the relevance of using BW and BCS changes for characterizing the diversity of BR mobilization–accretion profiles in sheep in a long timespan perspective.