The interplay between knowledge and governance: Insights from the governance of recreational boating in the Dutch Wadden Sea area, 1981–2014

• Published in: Environmental science & policy Vol. 55; pp. 436 - 448
• Main Authors: van der Molen, Franke, van der Windt, Henny J., Swart, Jac. A.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2016
• Subjects: Decentralized; Dynamics; Empirical analysis; Environmental governance; Exchanging; Experimentation; Interactive; Interfaces; Knowledge; Mathematical analysis; Nature conservation; Policies; Wadden Sea; ANE, Wadden Sea; Interfaces; Environmental governance; Knowledge; Wadden Sea; Nature conservation
• ISSN: 1462-9011; 1873-6416
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.012

•We investigate how shifts of environmental governance and knowledge are related.•Our analysis is informed by a case study on recreational boating in the Dutch Wadden Sea.•We apply a framework of governance modes, knowledge systems and interfaces.•Environmental governance and knowledge are coproduced and mutually constitutive.•Participatory knowledge creation enables increased stakeholder involvement in governance. Through shifts toward interactive and participatory forms of environmental governance, knowledge dynamics may come into play that differ from those of traditional forms of policy-making. This paper investigates how shifts of environmental governance and knowledge are related. In order to do so, it reconstructs the development of the governance of recreational boating in the Dutch Wadden Sea on the empirical basis of interviews, document analysis, and a focus group. Moreover, it analyzes this development by means of an analytical framework that combines governance modes, knowledge systems and knowledge–governance interfaces. Our results show that in the last decades partly an accumulation and partly a sequence of various governance arrangements concerning recreational boating has occurred; this has entailed a shift from predominantly centralized governance to a combination of governance modes with a stronger emphasis on decentralized, interactive and self-governance. This shift has occurred together with an increasing prominence of qualitative local knowledge, stakeholders’ knowledge, and the integration of various forms of knowledge. Furthermore, a shift has taken place toward more participatory knowledge–governance interfaces. Our analysis suggests that environmental governance and knowledge are interconnected in various ways: the regulatory and epistemic aspects of environmental issues are bound up with each other, and governance and knowledge are coproduced and mutually constitutive. Key lessons from this analysis are that room for experimentation is an important factor in improving environmental governance, and that increasing stakeholder involvement in governance implies that new modes of jointly creating and exchanging knowledge may need to be taken into account.