Effect of Mobile Phone App-Based Interventions on Quality of Life and Psychological Symptoms Among Adult Cancer Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 24; no. 12; p. e39799
• Main Authors: Qin, Minghui, Chen, Bo, Sun, Shaohua, Liu, Xiaodong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada Journal of Medical Internet Research 19.12.2022; Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor; JMIR Publications
• Subjects: Adult; Adults; Alleviation; Analysis; Anxiety; Behavior modification; Bias; Breast cancer; Cancer; Cancer Survivors; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Cell Phone; Cellular telephones; Chemotherapy; Clinical trials; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Cognitive therapy; Cognitive-behavioral factors; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Depression, Mental; Humans; Infrastructure; Intervention; Mental depression; Meta-analysis; Mobile Applications; Mobile phones; Multimedia; Neoplasms - psychology; Oncology, Experimental; Physical symptoms; Physician patient relationships; Prognosis; Psychological aspects; Psychological distress; Psychological manifestations of general diseases; Psychological problems; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Review; Self-efficacy; Smartphones; Software; Survivor; Symptoms; Systematic review; Telemedicine; Text messaging; cancer survivors; mobile phone; mobile health app; mHealth app; quality of life; psychological symptoms; systematic review and meta-analysis
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/39799

Most patients with cancer experience psychological or physical distress, which can adversely affect their quality of life (QOL). Smartphone app interventions are increasingly being used to improve QOL and psychological outcomes in patients with cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the effect of this type of intervention, with conflicting results in the literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the effectiveness of mobile phone app interventions on QOL and psychological outcomes in adult patients with cancer, with a special focus on intervention duration, type of cancer, intervention theory, treatment strategy, and intervention delivery format. We conducted a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang to identify studies involving apps that focused on cancer survivors and QOL or psychological symptoms published from inception to October 30, 2022. We selected only randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria and performed systematic review and meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% CI was pooled when needed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. In total, 30 randomized controlled trials with a total of 5353 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with routine care, app interventions might improve QOL (SMD=0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.51; P<.001); enhance self-efficacy (SMD=0.15, 95% CI 0.02-0.29; P=.03); and alleviate anxiety (SMD=-0.64, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.56; P<.001), depression (SMD=-0.33, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.08; P=.009), and distress (SMD=-0.34, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.08; P=.01). Short-term (duration of ≤3 months), physician-patient interaction (2-way communication using a smartphone app), and cognitive behavioral therapy interventions might be the most effective for improving QOL and alleviating adverse psychological effects. Our study showed that interventions using mobile health apps might improve QOL and self-efficacy as well as alleviate anxiety, depression, and distress in adult cancer survivors. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and the study design. More rigorous trials are warranted to confirm the suitable duration and validate the different intervention theories as well as address methodological flaws in previous studies. PROSPERO CRD42022370599; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=370599.