Habitat use of coexisting introduced eastern cottontail and native European hare

• Published in: Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde Vol. 78; no. 4; pp. 235 - 240
• Main Authors: Bertolino, Sandro, di Montezemolo, Nicola Cordero, Perrone, Aurelio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Elsevier GmbH 01.06.2013; Springer International Publishing
• Subjects: agricultural land; Agro-ecosystems; Animal Anatomy; Animal Ecology; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography; autumn; Evolutionary Biology; field crops; Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management; habitat conservation; habitats; hares; Histology; home range; introduced species; Lagomorpha; landscapes; Lepus; Lepus europaeus; Life Sciences; meadows; Morphology; Original Investigation; population; radio telemetry; shrublands; Species introduction; spring; summer; Sylvilagus floridanus; winter; woodlands; Zoology; Italy; Lepus europaeus; Species introduction; Agro-ecosystems; Lagomorpha; Sylvilagus floridanus
• ISSN: 1616-5047; 1618-1476
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2013.02.002

The niche of introduced species and that of native ones may overlap, thus causing detrimental effects on the latter through competitive interactions. We used radio telemetry to investigate habitat partitioning during the active period by the introduced American eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) and the native European hare (Lepus europaeus) in sympatric conditions. Home ranges of cottontails varied from 1.1–2.2ha in autumn to 3.0–3.6ha in summer. In hares, home ranges were 30.5–33.8ha in summer and increased to 49.5–85.9ha in winter. Both species used an overall area composed of about 27% of natural habitats (i.e., meadows, woodlands, shrubby habitats, shores, and uncultivated land) and over 70% of field crops. The coexistence of the two species appeared to be facilitated by habitat partitioning. Habitat use of cottontails was characterized by a preference for natural habitats at the study area level as well as within the home ranges, while hares showed a preference for crop fields at both spatial scales and a seasonal selection of meadows within home ranges. Habitat overlap measured with the Pianka index was 0.57–0.64 in autumn and winter, and increased in summer and spring to 0.73–0.78. Our results provide evidence of different resource selection strategies adopted by these two sympatric lagomorph species. Hare populations are often found in agricultural landscapes at low-densities, while cottontails are currently spreading throughout Northern Italy to such an extent that an eradication programme appears unfeasible. In this situation, conservation measures for hares and other species should also take into consideration the presence or possible arrival of cottontails. Habitat restoration measures that would increase the amount of fallow lands and shrublands may favour cottontails more than hares. In areas where introduced lagomorphs are present, the necessity of natural open landscapes for hares may be better faced by increasing the presence of meadows, that are seasonally used by hares and not by cottontails.