Influence of heritable social status on daily gain and feeding pattern in pigs

• Published in: Journal of animal breeding and genetics (1986) Vol. 127; no. 2; pp. 107 - 112
• Main Authors: Chen, C.Y, Misztal, I, Tsuruta, S, Herring, W.O, Holl, J, Culbertson, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2010; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Age; Animal breeding; Animal cognition; Animal models; Animals; Body Weight - genetics; Breeding; Competition; Cooperation; Feeding; feeding behavior; Feeding Behavior - physiology; Feeding behaviour; genetic correlation; Genetic relationship; Genetics; Hierarchy, Social; Hogs; Male; Social interactions; swine
• ISSN: 0931-2668; 1439-0388
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00828.x

Social genetic relationships among average daily gain (ADG, g) and feeding pattern as daily feed intake (DFI, g), daily feeder occupation time (DOT, min), and daily feeding rate (DFR, g/min) were examined using records of 547 Duroc boars. Single-trait animal models were fitted differently for traits, including or excluding social genetic effects, random or fixed pen effects, with covariates of pen sizes and initial age or weight. Genetic parameters for feeding pattern were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood. Six sets of parameters for ADG based on literature estimates were used due to difficulty in untangling confounded effects. Positive and negative signs of direct-social genetic covariances were interpreted as heritable cooperation and competition, respectively. Dominant and subordinate pigs were classified as pigs with higher direct and social genetic values, respectively. Correlations of estimated breeding values between ADG and DFI, DOT, and DFR were 0.46, 0.04 and 0.29 for dominant pigs. Given heritable cooperation, subordinate pigs tended to increase feed intake (r = 0.36) and eating rate (r = 0.25). Given heritable competition, subordinate pigs fail to compensate for the competition with decreased feed intake (r = -0.53). The slow eating rate (r = -0.31) was considered as a consequence of eating during less busy hour of feeding.