The effects of horse riding simulation exercise with blindfolding on healthy subjects’ balance and gait

[Purpose] The study was conducted to determine the effect of horse riding simulation combined with blindfolding on healthy individuals’ balance and gait. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group (n=15) and a control group (n=15). The subjects in the exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 28; no. 11; pp. 3165 - 3167
Main Authors Cha, Hyun Gyu, Lee, Byung Joon, Lee, Wan Hee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Society of Physical Therapy Science 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Purpose] The study was conducted to determine the effect of horse riding simulation combined with blindfolding on healthy individuals’ balance and gait. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group (n=15) and a control group (n=15). The subjects in the experimental group covered their eyes using a blindfold, climbed onto a horse riding simulator, and performed the horse riding simulation exercise. The control group took part in the horse riding exercises without a blindfold. All of the subjects performed the 20 minutes long exercise once a day, five times a week, over a four-week period. [Results] The experimental group showed significant improvement in static balance, dynamic balance, velocity, and cadence compared to pre-intervention measurements. In addition, the control group showed significant improvement in static balance, dynamic balance, single support, and cadence compared to pre-intervention measurements. Significant differences in post-training gains in static balance, dynamic balance, and cadence were observed between the experimental group and the control group. [Conclusion] Subjects that performed horse riding simulation exercise after blindfolding showed significant improvements in balance and cadence compared to the control group.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI:10.1589/jpts.28.3165