Longitudinal Trends in Use of Bone Mass Measurement Among Older Americans, 1999–2005

• Published in: Journal of bone and mineral research Vol. 23; no. 7; pp. 1061 - 1067
• Main Authors: Curtis, Jeffrey R, Carbone, Laura, Cheng, Hong, Hayes, Burton, Laster, Andrew, Matthews, Robert, Saag, Kenneth G, Sepanski, Robert, Tanner, Simpson B, Delzell, Elizabeth
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington, DC John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 01.07.2008; American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; Amer Soc Bone & Mineral Res
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Aged; Biological and medical sciences; BMD; Bone Density; DXA; epidemiology; Female; Fractures, Bone; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medicare; Original; osteoporosis; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging; Risk Factors; Skeleton and joints; United States; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system; Osteoarticular system; Osteoporosis; Vertebrata; Senescence; Mammalia; Bone mass; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; BMD; DXA; Epidemiology
• ISSN: 0884-0431; 1523-4681
• DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080232

Bone mass measurement (BMM) is useful to identify persons with low bone mass who are at increased risk for fracture. Given the increased emphasis that is being placed on preventive services such as screening for osteoporosis, we evaluated trends in BMM among Medicare beneficiaries. We studied a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 yr of age in 1999–2005. We identified claims for BMM tests performed in both facility and nonfacility settings, evaluated temporal trends in use of these tests, and described the proportion of tests attributable to each specialty of physicians submitting claims. We also assessed patterns of serial testing among individuals who were tested more than once. Claims data from all years were pooled to describe the proportion of persons in the population ever tested. From 1999 to 2005, use of central DXA increased by ∼50%, and use of peripheral DXA declined. The greatest increases in central DXA occurred among internists, family practitioners, and gynecologists. In 1999, the proportion of 65‐yr‐old women tested was 8.4%; this increased to 12.9% in 2005. Corresponding proportions for men were 0.6% and 1.7%, respectively. Between 40% and 73% of persons receiving central DXA were retested, most at ∼2‐yr intervals. Aggregating data across all years for whites and blacks, 30.0% of women and 4.4% of men underwent central DXA at least once. We conclude that, although use of DXA steadily increased from 1999 to 2005, only ∼30% of women and 4% of men at least 65 yr old had a central DXA study. Given the importance of central DXA to assess the risk of osteoporotic fractures, strategies to increase central DXA use to test at‐risk persons are warranted.