Implicit memory is independent from IQ and age but not from etiology: evidence from Down and Williams syndromes

• Published in: Journal of intellectual disability research Vol. 51; no. 12; pp. 932 - 941
• Main Authors: Vicari, S., Verucci, L., Carlesimo, G. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2007; Blackwell Publishing
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aetiology; Age; Brain; brain development; Child; Cognitive Development; Down Syndrome; Down Syndrome - complications; Down's syndrome; Etiology; Female; genetic syndrome; Humans; Implicit memory; intellectual disability; Intelligence; Intelligence quotient; Intelligence Tests; learning; Male; Memory; Memory Disorders - diagnosis; Memory Disorders - etiology; Mental Age; Mental Retardation; Neuropsychological Tests; Reaction Time; Serial Learning; Severity of Illness Index; Skill Development; Task Analysis; Williams Syndrome - complications; Williams' syndrome
• ISSN: 0964-2633; 1365-2788
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01003.x

Background  In the last few years, experimental data have been reported on differences in implicit memory processes of genetically distinct groups of individuals with Intellectual Disability (ID). These evidences are relevant for the more general debate on supposed asynchrony of cognitive maturation in children with abnormal brain development. This study, comparing implicit memory processes in individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS), was planned to verify the ‘etiological specificity’ hypotheses pertaining to the skill learning abilities of individuals with ID. Method  A modified version of Nissen and Bullemer's (1987) Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task was used. The performances of three group were evaluated. The first group consisted of thirty‐two people with WS (18 males and 14 females). The second group was comprised of twenty‐six individuals with DS (14 males and 12 females). The two groups of individuals with ID were selected so that the groups were comparable as for mental age and chronological age. The third group consisted of forty‐nine typically developed children with a mental age similar to that of the groups with WS and DS. Results  The two groups of individuals with ID demonstrated different patterns of procedural learning. WS individuals revealed poor implicit learning of the temporal sequence of events characterizing the ordered blocks in the SRT task. Indeed, differently from normal controls, WS participants showed no reaction time (RT) speeding through ordered blocks. Most importantly, the rebound effect, which so dramatically affected normal children's RTs passing from the last ordered to the last block, had only a marginal influence on WS children's RTs. Differently from the WS group, the rate of procedural learning of the participants with DS was comparable to that of their controls. Indeed, DS and typically developed individuals showed parallel RT variations in the series of ordered blocks and, more importantly, passing from the last ordered to the last block. Therefore, a substantial preservation of skill learning abilities in this genetic syndrome is confirmed. Conclusions  The results of the present study document that procedural learning in individuals with ID depends on the aetiology of the syndrome, thus supporting the etiological specificity account of their cognitive development. These results are relevant for our knowledge about the qualitative aspects and the underlying neurobiological substrate of the anomalous cognitive development in mentally retarded people.