Fracture Resistance of Direct versus Indirect Restorations on Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Bioengineering (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 6; p. 536
• Main Authors: Moussa, Carol, Savard, Guillaume, Rochefort, Gael, Renaud, Matthieu, Denis, Frédéric, Daou, Maha H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 24.05.2024; MDPI
• Subjects: Bias; Collaboration; Comparative analysis; Composite materials; Compression; Cusps; Datasets; Decision making; Dentistry; direct restoration; Finite element analysis; fracture resistance; Fracture toughness; Health aspects; Impact resistance; indirect restoration; Life Sciences; Mechanical properties; Meta-analysis; posterior teeth; Resins; Strength of materials; Synthesis; Systematic Review; Teeth; France; direct restoration; fracture resistance; indirect restoration; posterior teeth; Posterior teeth; Direct restoration; Fracture resistance; Indirect restoration
• ISSN: 2306-5354; 2306-5354
• DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060536

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare static compression forces between direct composite resin restorations and indirect restorations for posterior teeth. All studies comparing mechanical properties of direct versus indirect restorations of posterior teeth were included from 2007 up to February 2024. A meta-analysis was conducted for static compression fracture resistance. Medline, Central, and Embase databases were screened. Twenty-four articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, and sixteen studies were finally included in the quantitative synthesis. There was no difference in terms of fracture resistance between direct and indirect restorations for posterior teeth ( 0.16 for direct and indirect composite resin restorations and 0.87 for direct composite resin restorations and indirect ceramic restorations). Also, sub-group analysis with or without cusp coverage in each group revealed no discernable difference. Based on this study, it can be concluded that the choice between direct and indirect restoration approaches may not significantly impact fracture resistance outcomes. There was no statically significant difference between direct and indirect restorations for posterior teeth in all cases of restorations with or without cusp coverage and no matter the used materials. However, to better evaluate these materials, further studies are warranted.