Experimental study on the dynamic response of gravity-designed reinforced concrete connections

This paper reports an experimental programme aiming to shed some light on the response of non-seismic RC beam–column joints to excitations of different frequencies. The RC connections tested were designed only for gravity loads, thus rendering the joint cores weaker than the adjoining members when s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEngineering structures Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 75 - 87
Main Authors Dhakal, Rajesh Prasad, Pan, Tso-Chien, Irawan, Paulus, Tsai, Keh-Chyuan, Lin, Ker-Chun, Chen, Chui-Hsin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 2005
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper reports an experimental programme aiming to shed some light on the response of non-seismic RC beam–column joints to excitations of different frequencies. The RC connections tested were designed only for gravity loads, thus rendering the joint cores weaker than the adjoining members when subjected to a lateral load. Altogether, six tests were conducted on full-scale specimens, which were subjected to reversed cyclic displacements applied at different speeds varying from slow quasi-static loading to high-speed dynamic loading as fast as 20 Hz. Although all specimens as expected suffered joint shear failure, the maximum joint shear stresses observed in the tested specimens, despite lacking transverse hoops inside the joint cores, were more than the horizontal shear stresses allowed in ductile RC joints with the same grade of concrete according to the existing seismic design codes. The damage patterns and failures of the specimens showed a better correlation with the residual storey shear stiffness than with the loss of storey shear strength during the repeated cycles. By analysing the test results, this paper also discusses how an inadvertent inertial force develops during high-speed displacement reversals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0141-0296
1873-7323
DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.004